Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tigner v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Charles Henderson Tigner, IV
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, Bob Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tigner v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03644
Plaintiff:
Teresa Tigner
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tigner v. Memphis Police Department of Shelby County et al
as 2:2021cv02475
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Tigner, IV
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, J. Waddell, D. Tutera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Tigner
as 2:2018cv10652
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tenisha Tigner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
USA v. Charles Tigner
as 17-5542
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES TIGNER
Tigner v. Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, TN et al
as 2:2016cv02287
Plaintiff:
Charles Henderson Tigner, IV
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, TN, Connor Shielling, Gloria Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GCA Services Group, Inc. v. ParCou, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02251
Plaintiff:
GCA Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
ParCou, LLC, Southern Maintenance Systems, LLC, Jerry Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tigner v. Food Concepts International, LP et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Angie Tigner
Defendant:
Food Concepts International, LP , Abuelo's International LP , Mark Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Tigner et al v General Motors Corporation
as 2:2007cv02280
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation and General Motors Corporation
Plaintiff:
Todd Max Tigner and Todd Christopher Tigner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
