Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McDonald v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2022cv12676
Plaintiff:
Timmy McDonald
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Timmy McDonald v. US
as 08-8280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMMY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a/k/a United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, a/k/a United States Department of Justice, S. L. HAMLING, Sr. Off. Specialist, DEBORAH LIVINGSTON, Discip. Hrg Officer and others
USA v. Timmy McDonald
as 08-5665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMMY MCDONALD
McDonald v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Timmy McDonald
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice, Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008mc00002
Petitioner:
Timmy McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America, Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice, Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice and others
Timmy McDonald v. USA
as 08-5145
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMMY MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McDonald v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00131
Petitioner:
Timmy McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDonald v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Timmy McDonald
Defendant:
United States of America, S. L. Hamling, Deborah Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McDonald v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00095
Petitioner:
Timmy McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
