Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Bailey v. Tassler
as 2:2026cv00431
Petitioner:
Phillip Timothy Bailey
Respondent:
Joy Tassler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey et al v. Magnolia Estate of Pearl, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00426
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey and Dilenea Bailey
Defendant:
Magnolia Estate of Pearl, Inc., Southern Energy Homes, Inc. and Wood Mobile Home Transporters, LLC
Cross-Complainant:
Magnolia Estate of Pearl, Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
Wood Mobile Home Transporters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bailey v. Cleckler et al
as 1:2024cv03497
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey
Defendant:
Evergreen Transport, LLC. and James C. Cleckler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24945
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Bailey v. Cox, et al.
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey
Defendant:
T. Cox, W. Gunn, J Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Magalios v. Peralta
as 22-541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Magalios
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. Mathew Peralta, C.O. Timothy Bailey and C.O. Edward Blount
Magalios v. Peralta
as 22-519
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nicholas Magalios
Defendant / Appellant:
C.O. Mathew Peralta, C.O. Timothy Bailey and C.O. Edward Blount
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
