Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Jordan (Santos)
as 22-1714
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Santos, AKA Primo
United States of America v. Jordan (Hayes)
as 21-3005
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
James Tyrone Hayes, AKA Ty
United States of America v. Jordan (Lopez)
as 20-3996
Defendant:
Kent Jordan, AKA KJ, AKA Curtis, Domingo Alves, AKA Mingo, Timothy Booker, AKA Book and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Francisco Lopez
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booker v. Kegley et al
as 4:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Timothy Booker
Defendant:
James Kegley, Ramona Harris and Tarrant County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Booker v. Tarrant County et al
as 4:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Timothy Booker
Defendant:
Tarrant County, Green Bay Tarrant County, Sgt Keigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
