Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cannon, Timothy v. Wiese, Brittany et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cannon and Timothy M. Cannon
Defendant:
Brittany Wiese and Hunter Hackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogya v. Cannon et al
as 1:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Hope Hogya
Defendant:
Timothy Cannon, Sharleen Connolly and Lake County Probate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cannon v. USA
as 3:2020cv00763
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Timothy Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markiece Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Julie Jones, Eric Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Mr. Greenfield MD, PHD et al
as 3:2015cv01280
Plaintiff:
James Clifton Bradley and Third Regional Attorney's At Law for Defendant's Repertation General Counsel's Attorney's At Law
Defendant:
Mr. Greenfield MD, PHD, H. W. Priest, Diane Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Palmer et al
as 3:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Enoch Donnell Hall
Defendant:
John Palmer, Jeffery McClellan, Gina Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUKE v. CANNON
as 4:2015cv00071
Petitioner:
DANIEL LUKE
Respondent:
TIMOTHY CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUHAMMAD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JAMES R UPCHURCH , ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitsett v. Cannon et al
as 3:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Whitsett
Defendant:
Timothy Cannon , Secretary, Department of Corrections , Michael D. Hazen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrie Lemcool v. D. Pool, et al
as 12-14547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRIE LEMCOOL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. POOL, Assistant Warden, W. S. SMITH, Correctional Chaplain Service Specialist, CELEST KEMP, Chief of Inmate Grievance Appeals and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
