Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Howell v. Wells
as 8:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Timothy Howell
Defendant:
Rick Wells, Yvonne Miller, Tom Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Hobbs v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al
as 23-3406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence H. Hobbs
Defendant / Appellee:
Doe Run Resources Corporation, United States of America, Deb Haaland and others
Howell v. Richmond et al
as 0:2023cv61474
Plaintiff:
Timothy Howell
Defendant:
Dejarnira Richmond, B.S.O., Deerfield Beach Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15250
Plaintiff:
Timothy Howell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hobbs v. Doe Run Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H. Hobbs
Defendant:
Doe Run Corporation, United States of America, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01613
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HOWELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10370
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HOWELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dake v. Howell et al
as 2:2018cv04022
Plaintiff:
Celestel D Dake
Defendant:
Timothy Howell , James Gaddis and Aaron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Bowling et al
as 7:2015cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Phillip Bowling, Timothy Howell, Kyle Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
