Cases 11 - 20 of 319
Vanderlin v. Washoe County Sheriff's Offfice
as 3:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Vanderlin
Defendant:
Washoe County Sheriff's Offfice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Timothy Roberts
as 23-13895
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JAMES ROBERTS
Clingerman v. Genesee County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv12643
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Clingerman
Defendant:
Genesee County Jail, Steve Smith, Elizabeth Dewey and others
TURNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12264
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES TURNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRONEBACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11572
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES CRONEBACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11590
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES PALMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05371
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lowe v. Gregg County Jail
as 6:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Lowe
Defendant:
Gregg County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Timothy James Chappelle
Respondent:
Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappelle v. Jackson et al
as 6:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Chappelle
Defendant:
Austin Reeve Jackson, Unknown Nipp, Larry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
