Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00772
Plaintiff:
Patterson, Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Stoute v. Silverfine, et al
as 22-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN STOUTE
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY SILVERFINE, WILLIAM G. YOUNG, LEONARD H. KESTEN and others
Traditional Concepts, Inc. v. Smith, Jr. et al
as 4:2022cv40053
Plaintiff:
Traditional Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Smith, Jr., Robert Gendron, Carrie Monty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jenkins v. Melchiona et al
as 2:2021cv01941
Defendant:
Police Officer James Caporale, Police Officer Ryan Quarte, Police Officer Paul Rocchio and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoute v. Silverfine, et al
as 21-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
BRODY, HARDOON, PERKINS AND KESTON, LLP, DIEDRE BRENNAN REGAN, STEVEN TORRES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN STOUTE
Stoute v. Silverfine et al
as 1:2021cv10034
Defendant:
John Nivison, Joe Mendoca, William Young and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stoute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stoute v. Young et al
as 1:2020cv11226
Defendant:
City Of Tewksbury, Joe Mendonca, William G. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stoute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stoute v. Torres, et al
as 20-1466
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF TEWKSBURY, TIMOTHY SHEEHAN, Chief of Police of the City of Tewksbury, STEVEN TORRES, Tewksbury Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN STOUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
