Cases 1 - 10 of 12
STARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20881
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY STARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hutchinson v. Amberg et al
as 5:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Hutchinson
Defendant:
Brook Amberg, Graves County Circuit Court, John J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Stark v. Administrator of the Animal an
as 20-2024
Petitioner:
WILDLIFE IN NEED AND WILDLIFE IN DEED, INC. and TIMOTHY STARK
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE
Rustem Kazazi, et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot, et al
as 19-3270
Respondent:
RONALD D. VITIELLO, Actin Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Commissioner, US Customs and Border Protection and others
Petitioner:
RUSTEM KAZAZI, LEJLA KAZAZI and ERALD KAZAZI
Kazazi, et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2018mc00051
Petitioner:
Rustem Kazazi, Erald Kazazi and Lejla Kazazi
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Kevin McAleenan and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
In re: Timothy Starks
as 16-15610
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY STARKS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kelly v. Haley et al
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Justin Kelly
Defendant:
Randy Haley, D Warner, David Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rental Rescues LLC v. Starks et al
as 1:2014cv01429
Plaintiff:
Rental Rescues LLC
Defendant:
Timothy Starks and Sherita Starks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Timothy Starks
as 14-11519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY STARKS, a.k.a. Tim Brown
Timothy Starks v. USA
as 13-12875
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY STARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
