Cases 41 - 50 of 81
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2013cv04995
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TINSLEY et al v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2013cv03953
Plaintiff:
WENDY TINSLEY and DUANE TINSLEY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LENNON v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2012cv06701
Plaintiff:
JAMES LENNON
Defendant:
SHARON HILL BOROUGH , ROBERT TINSLEY , STEPHEN J. MUMMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LENTZ et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05121
Plaintiff:
RENEE L. LENTZ , MELANIE C. DE LE REE , HALLEY BONFANTI and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinsley v. Johnson, et al
as 12-3145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN JOHNSON, Administrator and SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, Avenel
TINSLEY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv06566
Plaintiff:
RUSSEL TINSLEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. MAZZOLA et al
as 2:2011cv06408
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. MAZZOLA, GREGORY E. SMITH, DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2011cv06174
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44863
Plaintiff:
DEREK E. TINSLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TINSLEY et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40488
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TINSLEY and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
