Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
DeVinney v. Jenkins et al
as 9:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: Philip W. DeVinney
Defendant: J. Jenkins, Dalton Russell and Tioga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
Baez v. Tioga County
as 9:2023cv01512
Plaintiff: Angelo Baez
Defendant: Tioga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tioga County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06098
Defendant: Indivior Inc, Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff: Tioga County, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Westchester County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv06096
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Westchester County, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tioga County, Cattaraugus County, NY, Putnam County, NY and others
Consolidated Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of Maryland Inc. doing business as Mid-Atlantic Customer Support Center, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Mitchell v. Irwin et al
as 3:2023cv01150
Plaintiff: Ian Francis Mitchell
Respondent: Superintendent Randy Irwin, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Tioga County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palisades Estates EOM, LLC et al v. County of Rockland, New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv04215
Plaintiff: Palisades Estates EOM, LLC, Newburgh EOM LLC d/b/a Crossroads Hotel, Ratan Newburgh LLC d/b/a Ramada By Wyndham and others
Defendant: County of Rockland, New York, Edwin J. Day, in his official capacity as County Executive of Rockland County,, Town of Orangetown, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-652
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Tioga County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and Susan Mulvey, New York State Police Investigator
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-503
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tioga County and Gerald Keene, Former Tioga County District Attorney
EAKIN et al v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff: BETTY EAKIN, INES MASSELLA, FETTERMAN FOR PA and others
Defendant: ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?