Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
McGee et al v. Schindler et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tawana Ann McGee and Timothy D'Angelo Mickell
Defendant:
Stephen Schindler, Benjamin Lopez and Mitchell Tipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIPTON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
WARREN RAY TIPTON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nandlal v. Tipton et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Brandi Nandlal
Defendant:
MD Matthew Tipton, Keith Ramsey, Maya Dominique and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
TIPTON v. TUNNER
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
MEGAN TIPTON
Respondent:
LASHELL TUNNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISIONER'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITY OF TIPTON et al
as 1:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CITY OF TIPTON and TIPTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
