Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McBride v. Jones
as 22-2070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Titus McBride
Defendant / Appellee:
G. Jones, Superintendent, D. Gleason, Deputy Superintendent of Security and A. Frederickson, Deputy Superintendent of Program
McBride v. Jones et al
as 9:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
G. Jones, D. Gleason and A. Frederickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Jones et al
as 9:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
G. Jones, A. Fredericksen and D. Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. City of New York
as 17-315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Titus McBride
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Assistant District Attorney Charles Kee and others
McBride v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
The City of New York, Office of Chief Medical Examiner, Charles Kee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. City of New York
as 16-4326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Titus McBride, Spc.
Respondent - Appellee:
Ada Pressley, Warden at Robert N. Davoren Center (RNDC)
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Albert Velez, Detective David Mischa and others
McBride v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06988
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Respondent:
Ada Pressley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv03203
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
Albert Velez and David Mischo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Secretary of the Treasury et al
as 1:2014cv10262
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
Secretary of the Treasury and Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McBride v. United States Treasury Department
as 1:2014cv10057
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
