Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Eatmon v. Banks
as 7:2013cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michael Eatmon
Defendant:
Toby Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Kirkland et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013mc03626
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tobie M. Kirkland
Garnishee:
MSI Inventory Service Corp
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
McDonald v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03592
Plaintiff:
Fredrick McDonald
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kim Thomas, Jimmy Patrick and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. May et al
as 2:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Black
Defendant:
Ronnie May, Anthony Pace, Mike Briley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02891
Plaintiff:
Toby Tyler , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Killeen v. Moates et al
as 1:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Killeen
Defendant:
Ben Moates, Dave Sutton, Tobie Dekker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Killeen v. Moates et al
as 2:2010cv02255
Plaintiff:
Michael Killeen
Defendant:
Ben Moates, Sutton, Tobie Dekker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hager v. Anniston Planning Commision, City of et al
as 4:2009cv02481
Plaintiff:
K. H. Hager
Defendant:
Anniston Planning Commision, City of, Toby Bennington, Jay Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cupps v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2009cv01959
Plaintiff:
Toby Cupps
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
