Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Bisges v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Tobie Bisges
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Williams v. Howard et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
Woody Howard, Robert Mays, Jimmy Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangels v. Twinings North America, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04138
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mangels, Tobie Pate and Margaret Valdespino
Defendant:
Twinings North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lacy v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2021cv04088
Defendant:
Martin Rucker, Gary Dusenberg, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Officer Jonathan Munyan, Major Scott Caron and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Thomas Bloodworth, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole
as 4:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Toby Edarwds Lacy
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UMB Bank N.A. v. Torstenson
as 4:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Toby T. Torstenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacy v. Callahan, et al.
as 4:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Timothy Hedricks, Unknown Callahan, Cora Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Toby E. Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Goodman et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Goodman and Joyce L. Goodman
Defendant:
Toby Freeman, Travis Sikes, Jamie Malugen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
