Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Las Americas Immigrant Advoca, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 20-5386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
K.M.V., and their minor child F.B.G.C., B.G.R., and her minor children, D.M.F.G., B.C.F.G., J.M.F.G., and S.F.G., L.E.R.D., minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Gloria Chavez, in her official capacity, Border Patrol Sector Chief, El Paso, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
P.J.E.S. v. Peter Gaynor, et al
as 20-5357
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Robert R. Redfield, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in his official capacity, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P.J.E.S., a minor child, by and through his father and next friend, Mario Escobar Francisco, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Amicus Curiae:
Natalia Molina, Gerald L. Neuman, Julian Lim and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02034
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
J. B. B. C. v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv01509
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
J. B. B. C. and E.Y.
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT
Petitioner:
SCHOLARS OF REFUGEE AND IMMIGRATION LAW
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
G. Y. J. P. v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv01511
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
G. Y. J. P.
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER v. WOLF et al
as 1:2019cv03640
Plaintiff:
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER, B.G.R., K.M.V. and others
Defendant:
CHAD WOLF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, INNOVATION LAW LAB and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Innovation Law Lab, et al v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-15716
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Innovation Law Lab et al v. Nielsen et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
John Lafferty, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Lee Francis Cissna and others
Plaintiff:
Tahirih Justice Center, Innovation Law Lab, Immigration and Deportation Defense Clinic at the University of San Francisco School of Law and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Al Otro Lado, Inc. et al v. McAleenan, et al
as 3:2017cv02366
Plaintiff:
Al Otro Lado, Inc., Jose Doe, Beatrice Doe and others
Defendant:
Todd C. Owen, Elaine C. Duke, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Respondent:
DOES 1-10, inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights at the University of Chicago Law School, Kids in Need of Defense, Members of Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 dj
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
