Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Slack v. Jinkens, et al.
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE SLACK
Defendant:
W. JINKENS, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, JENNIFER LNU, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, COMBS, Lieutenant at Benton County Correction and others
United States of America v. Slack
as 24-2404
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOMMIE SLACK
Slack v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Seattle, King County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Jinkens et al
as 4:2022cv05075
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
W Jinkens, Jennifer LNU, Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slack v. Woodbury et al
as 2:2020cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
James Mattmann, Michael Browning, Michael Preiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommie Slack v. Michael Woodbury, et al
as 19-35906
Defendant / Appellee:
CESAR GARCIA, Regional Justice Center, DAVID KNUTZEN, ELIUD RODRIGUEZ, Regional Justice Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMIE SLACK
Slack v. Washington Department of Correction Care Review Committee et al
as 3:2019cv05557
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Mary J Currey and Washington Department of Correction Care Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slack v. Woodbury et al
as 2:2019cv00159
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
Elliot, Sgt. Merritt, Micheal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slack v. Wright et al
as 3:2015cv05270
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
Earl X. Wright, Elaine Farr, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
