Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lindsey v. Pruitt et al
as 4:2019cv04737
Defendant:
Tommy Gage, Phil Grant, Philip Teissier and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lindsey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Tommy Gage, Phil Grant, Philip Teissier and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lindsey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel Curtis v. Donald Sowell, et al
as 18-20164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISRAEL CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD SOWELL, TOMMY GAGE, JOSEPH SCLIDER and others
Leslie Shipman v. Donald Sowell, et al
as 18-20155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER W. SHIPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DONALD SOWELL, SHERIFF TOMMY GAGE, JOSEPH SCLIDER and others
Larry Swearingen v. Sharon Keller, et al
as 17-51119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON KELLER, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals, LAWRENCE E. MEYERS, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals, BERT RICHARDSON, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Curtis v. Sowell et al
as 4:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Israel Curtis
Defendant:
Donald Sowell, Tommy Gage , Joseph Sclider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dobbs v. Montgomery County, Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03626
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dobbs
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Texas, Ahmed Syed, Randy McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swearingen v. Keller, et al
as 1:2016cv01181
Defendant:
Barbara Gladden Adamick, Elsa Alcala, Tommy Gage and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shipman v. Sowell et al
as 4:2016cv00692
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Shipman
Defendant:
Donald Sowell, Tommy Gage , Joseph Sclider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Land v. Tommy Gage, et al
as 15-20766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. LAND
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF TOMMY GAGE, LIEUTENANT MYRICK and MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
