Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Land v. Gage et al
as 4:2015cv02607
Plaintiff:
David W Land
Defendant:
Tommy Gage, Myrick and Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivas v. Cage et al
as 4:2014cv03067
Plaintiff:
Nabor M Olivas
Defendant:
Tommy Gage, Officer Davidson and Constable Roads
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Gage
as 4:2014cv02860
Petitioner:
Kevin M. Ham
Respondent:
Tommy Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gann v. Montgomery County et al
as 4:2014cv01575
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cleonn Gann
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Montgomery County Commissioner's Court, Montgomery County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAVES v. TOMBALL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Defendant:
TOMBALL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , LYNN LEBOEUF , KEVIN WHATLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. GRAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Chavez v. Montogmery County et al
as 4:2013cv01919
Petitioner:
Jacob Chavez
Respondent:
Montogmery County, Sheriff Tommy Gage, Sr. Sgt. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brent Fields v. Tommy Gage, et al
as 13-20306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT VONCEY FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY GAGE, Sheriff, in and for Montgomery County Texas and MAGGI CARMICHAEL, Open Record Division Management for Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Fields v. Gage et al
as 4:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
Brent Voncey Fields
Defendant:
Tommy Gage and Maggi Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowart v. Officer D. Lavergne et al
as 4:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Cowart
Defendant:
Officer D. Lavergne and Tommy Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Knight et al
as 4:2012cv01174
Plaintiff:
Jenny Roberts
Defendant:
Biff Knight, Scott Carson, Tommy Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
