Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Buford et al v. Caruthersville, Missouri, City of et al
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martel Buford, II and Dianna Walker
Defendant:
Caruthersville, Missouri, City of, Chris J. Wynes, William W. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Pemiscot County Prosecutor et al
as 1:2011cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Spencer
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Prosecutor, Danny Dodson, Jerry Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Pemiscot County Justice Center et al
as 1:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kenneth LaJohn Clay
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Justice Center, Pemiscot County Sheriff's Department, Tommy Greenwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Pemiscot County Justice Center et al
as 1:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ford
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Justice Center, Jerry Carter, Tommy Greenwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. Rogue Government Agents and Agencies et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Greg Lee Dugas
Defendant:
Rogue Government Agents and Agencies, Mike Bone, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Greenwell et al
as 1:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Montecarlo Jackson
Defendant:
Tommy Greenwell, Jerry Carter, Leonard Bellew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiderlen v. Greenwell et al
as 1:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
Tommy Greenwell, Jerry Carter, Jan Carter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clay v. Simmons et al
as 1:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kory Siujan Clay
Defendant:
Bob Simmons, Tommy Greenwell, Joe Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearod v. Greenwell
as 1:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Hearod, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Greenwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
