Cases 1 - 10 of 665
Proctor v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Proctor
Defendant:
Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines Singapore, PTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Jones
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Dr. Lisa Herring, Caroline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
CHV Group LLC et al v. Stauf AAT LLC
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHV Group LLC and Tony Koechli
Defendant:
Stauf AAT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PENA et al v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
TONI HIX PENA and JAMIE A PENA
Defendant:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Phan v. Bird
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tony Phan
Defendant:
Troy Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Adams et al
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Adams, Toni Michelle Adams, Amy Lester Astin and others
Defendant:
Bordeau Metals Southeast, LLC, BB&K Holdings, LLC, BB&K Holdings TN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
TAVERN DOWNING, SR, DOLLIE A DOWNING, TYLIA DOWNING and others
Defendant:
JESSES THOMAS, PAUL MCDUFFIE, JOEL PRESLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CONNOR v. MITCHELL
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
TONY L CONNOR, MOSES ROBERSON, KELVIN KING and others
Defendant:
Commander LARRY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
