Cases 21 - 30 of 504
Grimes v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Tony Grimes
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Benoit et al
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Pam Benoit, Ray Watts and Toni Rhodes Leeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Helms et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Mike McCorment, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. PNC Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Edward I Osborne
Defendant:
PNC Bank, Young Boozer and Tony S Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Grissom v. Merkle et al
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark Grissom
Defendant:
John Merkle, Nathan Whitaker, Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Tony Holcomb
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wooten v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Tony Wooten
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
