Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Terry et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, Nola Lucas and Jackie Pettway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oden et al
as 1:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Falon Hurst, Mike Willis, Jason Oden and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv01499
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Street et al
as 4:2019cv00751
Defendant:
Fred Lawton, III, Malcolm B Street, Jr, Kim McCarson and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Oden et al
as 2:2018cv01375
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jason Oden, Gary Cooper, Deputy Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Smith v. Warden, et al
as 14-14557
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY LEE SMITH, a.k.a. Wilhelm Von Wolf
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Tony Smith v. Sheriff of Clark County, et al
as 13-15615
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY LEE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERIFF OF CLARK COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Tony Smith v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 13-11173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRANCE MCDONNELL, Associate Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv03271
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
