Cases 41 - 50 of 82
TORRES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02289
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
MANUEL TORRES
949) 737-1504 (fax:
Matthew R. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice-Torres et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Anne Rice-Torres and John Torres
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics Inc , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv01522
Defendant:
BRIAN KNIGHT, C. A. PENFOLD, PAUL PRUCHIERE and others
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL R. TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Bigler et al
as 3:2017cv00180
Defendant:
Stefany Bigler, Lt Edwards and Officer Davis
Plaintiff:
Adrian Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. I.C. SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2017cv00419
Defendant:
I.C. SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARTHA E. TORRES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TORRES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02736
Respondent:
STANDLY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RAFAEL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02734
Respondent:
STANDLY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RAFAEL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02735
Respondent:
STANDLY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RAFAEL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02737
Respondent:
STANDLY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RAFAEL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00174
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
