Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Design Toscano, Inc. v. Kirtley
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Design Toscano, Inc.
Defendant:
Pamela K Kirtley doing business as Texas Tradition Molds
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DESIGN TOSCANO, INC. v. THE CONCRETE LADY, INC.
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
DESIGN TOSCANO, INC.
Defendant:
THE CONCRETE LADY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Design Toscano, Inc. v. Kirtley
as 6:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
Design Toscano, Inc.
Defendant:
Pamela K Kirtley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Star Fabrics Inc v. Oneworld Imports et al
as 2:2014cv09773
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Does, Eminent Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Star Fabrics, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09190
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Does, Flower Child Forever, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics, Inc.
Tec Serv, LLC, et al v. Marilyn Toscano, et al
as 14-11309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEC SERV, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company and JOHN R. TOSCANO, INC., a Florida corporation
Interested Party - Appellant:
MARILYN TOSCANO and JOHN TOSCANO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ALAN CRABB, individually and A DESIGN AT SUNNINGHILL, INC., a Florida corporation
Star Fabrics Inc v. Stardust International Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv03987
Defendant:
Does, Hautelook Inc, Nordstrom Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Maglificio Valda, S.P.A. v. Toscano Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01786
Plaintiff:
Maglificio Valda, S.P.A.
Defendant:
Toscano Inc. and PYA USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
