Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mora-Tovar et al v. Mattu Express Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv08013
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Mora-Tovar, Angelica Maria Ramirez Lopez, Maria De Los Angeles Tovar and others
Defendant:
Mattu Express Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Pawandeep Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kraft v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Michael Reese, Jonathan S Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tovar v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Raul Tovar
Respondent:
C Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kraft v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv01491
Defendant:
M Reese, Queen E Land LLC, Daniel Tovar and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Barrera v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv01319
Defendant:
Unknown Coscareli, Rebecca Hodges, Christopher J Marak-Durand and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granillo Barrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tovar v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00552
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Patricia J Tovar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tovar et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03606
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Frank Tovar and Donna Tovar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Markham v. Surprise, City of et al
as 2:2015cv01696
Plaintiff:
Nancy Markham
Defendant:
Surprise, City of , Michael Frazier , Christopher Tovar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
