Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lorick Jr v. Town of Fishkill et al
as 7:2024cv02586
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lorick JR
Defendant:
Town of Fishkill and Police Officer Jessie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Town of Fishkill et al
as 7:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Chassity Wade
Defendant:
Town of Fishkill and Joseph DiPalma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLD3 LLC et al v. Albra et al
as 7:2021cv11058
Plaintiff:
GLD3 LLC and Snook-9 Realty Inc.
Defendant:
Azem Albra, Jacqueline Bardini, Joseph Buono and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Bierce v. Schepperly et al
as 7:2020cv00320
Defendant:
James Schepperly and Town of Fishkill
Plaintiff:
Scott Bierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koopman et al v. SBA Communications Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv07599
Plaintiff:
Paul Koopman and Magdalena Koopman
Defendant:
SBA Communications Corporation , Scenic Hudson, Inc., Scenic Hudson Land Trust, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Town of Fishkill et al
as 7:2015cv02838
Plaintiff:
Joann Morris
Defendant:
Town of Fishkill , Christopher Stewart and John/Jane Does I through IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Perez
as 14-471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Town of Fishkill, Superintendent Ada Perez, John Doe, Supervisor of Town and others
Hill v. Perez et al
as 1:2013cv05156
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Ada Perez, William Many, B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv06921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Campbell et al
as 7:2012cv03233
Plaintiff:
Alan Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Andre B. Campbell, Jason K. Farney, Dutchess County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
