Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Town of Superior et al v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson, Colorado, The et al
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff: TOWN OF SUPERIOR, COLORADO and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
Defendant: THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, COLORADO and DR. STEPHANIE CORBO
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 47101 - Airport & Airway Improvement Act
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Town of Superior, The et al
as 1:2022cv02680
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights, Charles Bradley Walker and others
Defendant: Town of Superior, The, City of Louisville, Colorado, City of Boulder, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. City of Boulder, Colorado
as 1:2022cv02112
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights and James Michael Jones
Defendant: City of Boulder, Colorado
Interested Party: Town of Superior, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02113
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights and Martin Carter Kehoe
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County
Interested Party: The Town of Superior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
National Association for Gun Rights et al v. CIty of Louisville, Colorado
as 1:2022cv02111
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights, Bryan Lafonte and others
Defendant: City of Louisville, Colorado
Interested Party: Town of Superior, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Town of Superior, The et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights and Charles Bradley Walker
Defendant: Town of Superior, The and Joe Pelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Manriquez v. Joel Ensley, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16917
Defendant: ANTHONY DORAN, TOWN OF SUPERIOR, a political subdivision and RICHARD H. MUELLER
Defendant / Appellant: BRYAN LAWRENCE and JOEL CHRISTIAN ENSLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee: RICHARD MANRIQUEZ
Town of Superior, The v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01746
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Greg Sheehan and David Lucas
Plaintiff: Town of Superior, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4331
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD
Plaintiff: THE TOWN OF SUPERIOR, a Colorado municipality and CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, KEN SALAZAR, acting in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: JEFFERSON COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF ARVADA, JEFFERSON PARKWAY PUBLIC HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and others
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. U. S. Fish and Wildlife, et al
as 12-1509
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE TOWN OF SUPERIOR, a Colorado municipality
Plaintiff: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, KEN SALAZAR, acting in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: JEFFERSON COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF ARVADA, JEFFERSON PARKWAY PUBLIC HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?