Cases 41 - 50 of 915
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kabisch v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kabisch
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Thoma Bravo Fund XIII, L.P., Thoma Bravo Fund XIV, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
TRAMMELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19882
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREW TRAMMELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perkins Sr. et al v. Davidson County et al
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Perkins Sr. and Temeshia Trammell
Defendant:
Davidson County, Davidson County Sheriff Dept. and Daron Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6095
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Trammell v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02305
Plaintiff:
Dennis Trammell
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC)Trammel v. Ramos et al
as 1:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Demarion Trammel
Defendant:
A. Ramos, Zomora Ortiz and Ortiz Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Trammel v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Demarion Trammel
Defendant:
A. Ramos, Zomora Ortiz and Ortiz Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Trammel v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Demarion Trammel
Defendant:
A Ramos, H Zamora Ortiz, Ortiz Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
