Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LeAnthony Winston v. Megan Montoya
as 23-7185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANTHONY T. WINSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN MONTOYA, ROBERT BROADBENT, LINDSEY SANTOS and others
LeAnthony Winston v. Megan Montoya
as 23-6138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, a/k/a LeeAnthony T. Winston
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN MONTOYA, ROBERT BROADBENT, LINDSEY SANTOS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ford v. Trate
as 1:2022cv02749
Petitioner:
Quindell Ford
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eunice Husband v. Harrell Watt
as 11-6771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUNICE HUSBAND
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals; individual capacity, K. M. WHITE, Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office; individual capacity, JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton; individual capacity and others
Felix Ibarra-Villalva v. Bureau of Prison
as 10-6889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIX IBARRA-VILLALVA
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, MR. GALLICK, Counselor, USP Allenwood, MR. WOLERER, Unit Manager, USP Allenwood and others
Husband v. Watts et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, K. M. White, Joe D. Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ibarra-Villalva v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Gallick, Wolerer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Piggee v. Olinger et al
as 2:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Douglas Sharron Piggee
Defendant:
C. Olinger, Antonelli, L. Oddo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
