Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Magee v. Day et al
as 2:2022cv02589
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Magee, Jr.
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, Travis Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaffer v. Day
as 22-30452
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antione Schaffer
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Colvin v. Day
as 22-30368
Petitioner / Appellant:
James L. Colvin
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Heavner v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Keith Lee Heavner
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Assistant Warden Sanders, Travis Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuza v. Day et al
as 2:2022cv01354
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cuza
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Day
as 5:2022cv01192
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harry v. Day
as 22-30154
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kyle Jamar Harry
Respondent / Appellee:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Edward Bickham, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Pete v. Day et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Norman Pete
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
