Cases 31 - 40 of 205
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv18009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CASTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN, JONATHAN GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2021cv16029
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOE R. BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv13353
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, SHIRLEY K. TURNER, VERLINA REYNOLDS-JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv13359
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BAHP, US ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv12992
Defendant:
MR. WHEELER, ROBERT RULBERELL, JUDGE GOLDBER and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marta Jo Stampone, et al v. Brittian Amann, et al
as 21-1881
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLIE C. SAWYER, LOU ANDRIOTTI, SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE and MARTA JO STAMPONE, f/k/a Hieshetter
Gabriel Pittman v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-1486
Defendant:
REBECCA RIEFER, P. NUNEZ, BARRY SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
