Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
Stiltner v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stiltner
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Kenny Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coday v. Key et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Coday
Defendant:
Pat Key , Tulsa County Clerk , Steve Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benge v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY BENGE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA EX REL. TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. TULSA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LARRY G. MARK and others
Ybarra-Johnson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Sara Ybarra-Johnson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Douglas Anthony Ducey, Michele Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabtree v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 13-5153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. CRABTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, PAMELA BEARD and others
Crabtree v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2013cv00688
Plaintiff:
Charles E Crabtree
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Pamela Beard, Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemmons v. Collins, et al
as 12-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIN DON LEMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORBIN COLLINS, KEVIN STATTS, JAMES HENDERSON and others
Baker v. Holt, et al
as 12-5029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD L. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY HOLT, GLENWOOD APARTMENTS, CLAY COFFMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
