Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Moore v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Moore
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2023cv00516
Petitioner:
Keith Dewane Hopper
Respondent:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Tulsa County District Court et al
as 4:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Travis Dray Stewart
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. United States Government et al
as 4:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Derek Long, Tulsa Police Department, The, State of Oklahoma, The and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Glenn Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Farris
as 4:2020cv00526
Respondent:
Tulsa County District Court and Jim Farris
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Funkhouser v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2020cv00219
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Tulsa County District Court
Plaintiff:
Dennis Stephen Funkhouser and Dennis Steven Funkhouser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Luginbyhl v. Dowling et al
as 4:2019cv00477
Defendant:
Diana Collins, State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
