Cases 1 - 10 of 2,864
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
YEHOWSHUA I TURNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jesus Rivera, et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 24-11311
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA, SIAKA MASSAQUOI, GREGORY PURDY, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DIRECTOR OF F.B. I., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Turner v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Turner
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Munoz v. Turner
as 1:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Peter Munoz
Defendant:
Robin Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Turner v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01795
Petitioner:
Michael Renaldo Turner
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner, Mason v. Monroe County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv10035
Plaintiff:
Mason C. Turner
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner, Mason v. Palm Beach County Sheriff
as 9:2024cv80502
Plaintiff:
Mason C. Turner
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
