Cases 21 - 30 of 52
RHODES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
TERI ANNE RHODES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOHN TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUTTLE v. POTTER, SCOTT & ASSOCIATES INC.
as 2:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TUTTLE
Defendant:
POTTER, SCOTT & ASSOCIATES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ritter v. Tuttle et al
as 3:2014cv02247
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ritter, Jr.
Defendant:
Jordan Tuttle and David Argall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUTTLE et al v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2014cv02205
Plaintiff:
AMANDA N. TUTTLE and BRIAN TUTTLE
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUTTLE v. WINGARD, et al
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
GREGORY TUTTLE and CONNIE TUTTLE
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD , DANA PHILLIPS , VIRGINIA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKHOLDER et al v. TUTTLE
as 5:2013cv06375
Plaintiff:
DIEDRE D. BURKHOLDER and ROBERT J. BURKHOLDER
Defendant:
CURTIS TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Holt et al
as 1:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
R. Holt, Bracket, Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Shawn T Jones
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kimberly Clark, B. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
