Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Mapfre Peru Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros S.A. et al v. M/V As Fortuna et al
as 1:2020cv05606
Plaintiff:
Corporacion Uezu S.A.C., Rash Peru S.A.C., Puig Peru S.A. and others
Defendant:
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. d/b/a Blue Anchor America Line, DSV GL Ecuador S.A., As Fortuna Opco B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Tracy et al v. 3M et al
as 3:2014cv00705
Defendant:
3M, CSR, Ltd., Teledyne Technologies Incorporated and others
Cross Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc., Dewitt Products Co., Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Giola Tracy and Bryce Tracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
SCEARCE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv06676
Plaintiff:
RONALD S. SCEARCE and ALISA J. SCEARCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ALPHA WIRE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Haney v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2012cv01396
Plaintiff:
Charles Haney
Defendant:
3M Company, AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles C Curtis v. Abb Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02014
Defendant:
Abb Inc, American Insulated Wire Corporation, Borg Warner Morse Tec Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Curtis
Unknown:
Thomas Jeffrey Moses
Asmaa Guennoon, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16771
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASMAA GUENNOON, individually, as legal guardian of Kenza Tazi Moukha and Amina Tazi Moukha, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Rajea Tazi Moukha, deceased, M'BARKA ASRI, individually, as legal guardian of Mohamed Amine Faouzi and Zayed Faouzi, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Ahmed Faouzi, deceased, ASMAA BERGHAZI, individually, as legal guardian of Yassine Haddour and Yazid Haddour, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate Fouad Haddour, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Margita Gergelova, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16767
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGITA GERGELOVA, and as successor -in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, VIKTOR GERGEL, and as successor-in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased, and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, ALIA FAROUKH, and as legal guardian for Karim Warde Khalifeh and Mohamad Ali Khalifeh, as successor-in-interest to Hussein Mounir Khalifeh deceased and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hussein Mounir Khalifeh and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Renato Cotta v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16769
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENATO MACHADO COTTA, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bianca Pires Cotta
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Anna Hudecova, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16756
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNA HUDECOVA, individually, as successor-in-interest to Michal Hudec, deceased, and as personal representative of the Estate of Michael Hudec, MONIKA HUDECOVA, individually and as succesor-in-interest to Michael Hudec, deceased and MICHAELA JURIGOVA HUDECOVA, individually and as successor-in-interest to Michael Hudev
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
