Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Duncan v. Commonwoalta Attorneys
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Commonwoalta Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. King
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Hon. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nguyen v. CR England, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01668
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nguyen
Defendant:
CR England, Inc. and Tyrone Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Duncan v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Virgin Islands Industrial Maintenance Corp., HESS CORPORATION and Hess Oil New York Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2020cv00837
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION and Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03840
Plaintiff:
Brendalynne Duncan and Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Brendalynne Duncan, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 14-13344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDALYNNE DUNCAN and TYRONE DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., PENDERGAST & ASSOCIATES, P.C., HOWELL A. HALL and others
Brendalynne Duncan, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 14-10625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDALYNNE DUNCAN and TYRONE DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., PENDERGAST & ASSOCIATES, P.C., HOWELL A. HALL and others
Duncan v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00718
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and Canteen Kitchen Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
