Cases 1 - 10 of 41
McCanles v. U S Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Rustin McCanles
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons and Warden Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abbott v. Otis-Sanders et al
as 2:2022cv01271
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
Loretia Otis-Sanders, Shelley Power, Shelia Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv03890
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Sekou Ma'at, Oscar Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 2:2021cv03774
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Shelly Power, Loretta Otis-Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Silas Harris
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gines v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Paula Bradford Gines
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PENDERGRASS v. U S BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 4:2018cv00570
Defendant:
U S ATTORNEY GENERAL and U S BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
BRIONNA PENDERGRASS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Penitentiary Pollock
as 1:2018cv01440
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
Warden U S Penitentiary Pollock, U S Bureau of Prisons and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xiong v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00776
Plaintiff:
Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Warden Oakdale Correctional Complex and Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
