Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 0:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Gerald et al
as 0:2020cv00070
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons and B. Gerald
Plaintiff:
Duane Alan Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Economic/Commercial/Organization et al
as 3:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ramon J. Francis
Defendant:
Satellite Monetary Circulation, Mind Control Probe, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duvall v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2019cv00100
Petitioner:
Duane Alan Duvall
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Greene v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Warden Gregory A. Kizziah, Michael Horrowitz, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fenwick v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Fenwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moose v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv00272
Defendant:
J.E. Krueger, Mr. Fardel, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Walker
Defendant:
J.C. Holland, Joe Doe, Rhonda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alaniz v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Reymundo Alaniz
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
