Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 360
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant: LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee: LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
AMERICAN RIVERS et al v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff: HEALTHY GULF, NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, AMERICAN RIVERS and others
Defendant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Russellville Legends LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1778
Defendant / Appellee: Eric M. Noe, Colonel, District Engineer, Little Rock District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock Division and United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant: Russellville Legends LLC
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-10780
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CALUSA WATERKEEPER, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC.
Snake River Waterkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant: Scott Spellmon and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff: Snake River Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Inc. et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00317
Plaintiff: Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association - West, Healthy Gulf and Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Not Classified By Court: Atchafalaya Basinkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00244
Plaintiff: NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Petitioner: RANKIN-HINDS PEARL RIVER FLOOD AND DRAINAGE CONTROL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
South Carolina, State of v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1085
Defendant / Appellant: MAJOR GENERAL DIANA M. HOLLAND, in her official capacity as Commanding General, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and others
Clare Land LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00034
Defendant: U.S .Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, South Florida Water Management District and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff: Clare Land LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willamette Riverkeeper et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00034
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: Conservation Angler and Willamette Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?