Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
WaterWatch of Oregon et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2020cv00413
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and WaterWatch of Oregon
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)
Intervenor Defendant:
Chair Mike Grimm Oregon Water Utility Council and Oregon Farm Bureau Federation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Northern Plains Resource Council et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 4:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Earth, Bold Alliance, Northern Plains Resource Council and others
Defendant:
LT. General Todd T. Semonite and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor Defendant:
TC Energy Corporation and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Weiss Law, P.C. v. Awrish Builders et al
as 3:2019cv02258
Defendant:
Awrish Builders, Abdul Mujeeb Mohmand, Abdul Muqeem Mohmand and others
Plaintiff:
WEISS LAW, P.C.
Interested Party:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al v. Pruitt et al
as 3:2018cv03521
Plaintiff:
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. , Center For Biological Diversity , Center for Food Safety and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ricky Dale James and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of the Earth v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2018cv00677
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Earth
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Friends of the River v. NMFS, et al
as 18-15623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE RIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, WILBUR ROSS, Secretary of Commerce, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
Northwest Environmental Defense Center et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2018cv00437
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Native Fish Society, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and WildEarth Guardians
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 18-35152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHWEST RIVER PARTNERS
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 18-35111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
