Cases 11 - 20 of 31
WILSON v. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 2:2019cv00330
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA CIRCUIT, D.O.J., STATE OF INDIANA COURT OF APPEAL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL CURTIS HILL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Defendant:
U.S., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Echols et al
as 1:2019cv00284
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney General, Chestina M Echols and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. US Dist. Court et al
as 1:2017cv06336
Petitioner:
Joseph Donelson
Respondent:
US Dist. Court , U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cameron v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2017cv03374
Plaintiff:
Cynthia E Cameron
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRISON COUNTY HOSPITAL v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
HARRISON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Interested Party:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
