Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Kurt Kanam v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5121
Petitioner:
Kurt Kanam and Pilchuck Nation
Respondent:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, or his successor, U.S. Department of the Interior and Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, or her successor, U.S. Department of the Interior
Allegheny Wood Products, Inc. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 24-1221
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
VAN DER WERF et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
ESTHER VAN DER WERF, TOBY STOVER and ELIZABETH DASBURG
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and CHARLES F. SAMS, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Gwich'in Steering Committee, Alaska Wilderness League, Alaska Wildlife Alliance and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana by and through its Attorney General Jeff Landry, American Petroleum Institute, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Laura Daniel-Davis, Elizabeth Klein and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Shell Offshore Inc
Intervenor Defendant:
Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and others
Amicus Curiae:
Bruce Westerman, Garret Graves, Pete Stauber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. J.R. Simplot Company, et al
as 23-35544
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35543
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. DOI, et al
as 23-5170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. DOI, et al
as 23-5162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
