Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lucido v. U.S. Legal Support, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Paul Lucido
Defendant:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc. and CHARLES SCHUGART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Armstrong v. U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03659
Plaintiff:
C. Armstrong
Defendant:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
MINSKY v. U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC
as 9:2018cv80954
Plaintiff:
DARA MINSKY
Defendant:
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
U.S. Legal Support, Inc. v. Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC
as 1:2017cv07989
Defendant:
Napoli Shkolnik PLLC
Plaintiff:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Marc J. Bern & Partners, LLP v. U.S. Legal Support Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06771
Defendant:
U.S. Legal Support Inc. and Paul Lucido
Plaintiff:
Marc J. Bern & Partners, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Latisha Glaspie v. U.S. Legal Support, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04965
Defendant:
Does and U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Latisha Glaspie
U.S. Legal Support, Inc. v. Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC et al
as 1:2017cv00604
Defendant:
Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP and Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC
Plaintiff:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DIDONATO v. U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.
as 2:2015cv06035
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DIDONATO
Defendant:
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. and JOSEPH J. SARACO
Counter_claimant:
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.
Counter_defendant:
GREGORY DIDONATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
U.S. Legal Support, Inc. v. Hefler et al
as 4:2015cv01464
Plaintiff:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Hefler and Next Generation Reporting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv62570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
