Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Chadd v. Cape Girardeau County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Alan Chadd
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau County Jail, John Jordan and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Petitioner:
August B. Porter
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finerson v. St. Francois County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Anthony Finerson
Defendant:
St. Francois County Jail, John Doe, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. St. Louis City Justice Center et al
as 4:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wallace
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center, L. Edward, R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sours v. Arnott et al
as 6:2012cv03397
Petitioner:
William Scott Sours
Respondent:
James Arnott and U.S. Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. DUSM Supervisor et al
as 4:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
John F. Martin
Defendant:
DUSM Supervisor, U.S. Marshals Service, Lawrence Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jeremy W. Floyd
Defendant:
Kathy Hollenbeck and U.S. Marshals on Duty of Day of Incident; Listed as John Doe 1 Thru 7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01001
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. Nixon
as 4:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, Robin Carnahan, Mo Governor's Extradition Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Devore et al
as 4:2009cv01236
Petitioner:
Corey Louis Hines
Respondent:
Jerry Devore, Matthew Schelp, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
