Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Warden Ward, Lt. Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Bennett, III
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeVaughn v. U.S. Marshall Service et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
Michael O DeVaughn
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service and Sheriff of Jefferson County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Higginbotham v. Pleasant Grove, City of et al
as 2:2011cv03904
Plaintiff:
Barry C Higginbotham
Defendant:
Pleasant Grove, City of, Jerry W Brasseale, Willliam Bullion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinsey et al v. Watkins et al (MEMBER)
as 2:2011cv00314
Plaintiff:
C. H. Kinsey and Janie L. Kinsey
Defendant:
William Keith Watkins, Debra P. Hackett and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinsey et al v. Watkins et al (MAG+) (LEAD)
as 2:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
C. H. Kinsey and Janie L. Kinsey
Defendant:
William Keith Watkins, Debra P. Hackett and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yeager v. Hardy et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00896
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
A. J. Hardy, Janice Hopkins, Sgt. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
