Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 1:2015cv00669
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, BRAD BIERMAN, SUSAN DLOTT and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, LARRY E. EALY and SCLG-LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00481
Defendant:
JENNIFER COFFMAN, FBI OFFICE, SECRET SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
STACY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DILLARD v. U.S. MARSHAL, ANN CHAMBLERS et al
as 3:2012cv00005
Defendant:
CAPT. MCQUISTON, LT. HENDRIX, LT. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2011cv01587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SYKES v. ELLIOT et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Defendant:
CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE OF BOP, MR. ELLIOT, WARDEN KASNER and others
Plaintiff:
MARRICCO A. SYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARR v. ALDRIDG et al
as 1:2010cv00690
Defendant:
2ND MARSHAL PRESENT ON JUNE 5, 2008 and U.S. MARSHAL BRIAN ALDRIDGE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GREER et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN FELIX GREER and BARACK H OMAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTTON v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01025
Plaintiff:
VON DERRICK SUTTON
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and U.S. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
