Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Graham v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 0:2020cv01204
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal and Joel L. Brott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bui v. U.S. Attorney et al
as 0:2020cv00740
Plaintiff:
Bui and Michael John Bui
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney Chad A Blumenfield and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bui v. U.S. Attorney et al
as 0:2020cv00418
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney, Chad A. Blumenfield and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 0:2020cv00376
Respondent:
Joel Brott, U.S. Marshals Service, President Donald J. Trump and others
Petitioner:
Michael A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bui v. US Attorney et al
as 0:2019cv02785
Defendant:
US Attorney, Chad A. Blumenfield and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrews v. United States of America et al
as 0:2019cv02732
Respondent:
Joel Brott, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Norris Deshan Andrews and Norris Deshon Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bakke v. United States of America et al
as 0:2019cv02501
Respondent:
Joel Brott, U.S. Marshals Service, President Donald J. Trump and others
Petitioner:
Eric Christopher Bakke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. MEND Medical Services et al
as 0:2016cv04015
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Jesus Garcia
Defendant:
MEND Medical Services, Gwen Blossom, Michelle Skroch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Egelhof et al
as 0:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Garrett Lee Jones
Defendant:
John Egelhof, Donavon Wind, Thomas B. Heffelfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundeen v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2014cv01168
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Lundeen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, City of Minneapolis, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
