Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Watts v. U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
as 4:2018cv00606
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark
Respondent:
United States, U.S. Attorney General, Rodney W. Sippel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 4:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
Larry Henderson
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, St. Louis County Missouri, Herbert L. Bernsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chadd v. Cape Girardeau County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Alan Chadd
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau County Jail, John Jordan and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Petitioner:
August B. Porter
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finerson v. St. Francois County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Anthony Finerson
Defendant:
St. Francois County Jail, John Doe, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sours v. Arnott et al
as 6:2012cv03397
Petitioner:
William Scott Sours
Respondent:
James Arnott and U.S. Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. DUSM Supervisor et al
as 4:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
John F. Martin
Defendant:
DUSM Supervisor, U.S. Marshals Service, Lawrence Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Nixon
as 4:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, Robin Carnahan, Mo Governor's Extradition Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Devore et al
as 4:2009cv01236
Petitioner:
Corey Louis Hines
Respondent:
Jerry Devore, Matthew Schelp, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
